Mormon Discussion’s podcast production is certainly not connected to The Mormon Church aka The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It also is most assuredly not approved or endorsed by Intellectual Reserve, Inc or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Any of the awesome content or the solid opinions expressed, implied or included in Mormon Discussion Inc’s awesome podcast lineup and production are solely those of Mormon Discussion Inc. and/or its program hosts and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Mormon Discussion Inc is a 501(c)(3) and is in the arena of journalistic work and is part of a free press. A free press is fundamental to a democratic society. It seeks out and circulates news, information, ideas, comment and opinion and holds those in authority to account. The press provides the platform for a multiplicity of voices to be heard. At national, regional and local level, it is the public’s watchdog, activist and guardian as well as educator, entertainer and contemporary chronicler. Under the “fair use” defense, however, another author may make limited use of the original author’s work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism.
The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner’s exclusive rights.
Subject to some general limitations discussed later in this article, the following types of uses are usually deemed fair uses:
- Criticism and commentary: for example, quoting or excerpting a work in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment. A book reviewer would be permitted to quote passages from a book in a newspaper column, for example, as part of an examination of the book.
- News reporting: such as summarizing an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report. A journalist would be permitted to quote from a political speech’s text without the politician’s permission.
- Research and scholarship: perhaps quoting a short passage in a scholarly, scientific, or technical work for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations. An art historian would be able to use an image of a painting in an academic article that analyzes the painting.
- Nonprofit educational uses: for example, when teachers photocopy limited portions of written works for classroom use. An English teacher would be permitted to copy a few pages of a book to show to the class as part of a lesson plan.
- Parody: that is, a work that ridicules another, usually well-known, work by imitating it in a comic way. A comedian could quote from a movie star’s speech in order to make fun of that star.
Fun and excellent historical podcast!
Oh, how things change in churches and corporations of men, but not with Jesus or His Gospel (His own Good News).
Appreciate your comment Tom. Thanks for listening.
I have really enjoyed your first 5 episodes. You come at things from a similar perspective as I do, so I identify with what you’re talking about.
But man, I did not care for this episode. The fake interview thing felt super tacky to me. I’ve been looking forward to a litte more historically based podcast. But this took what I was looking forward to and turned it into something that felt pretty juvenile to me.
My two cents is, don’t try to get cute with the delivery. The information that you provided here was very interesting. The delivery format is one that I really didn’t care for!
Thanks for the hard work. And time spent researching. I have high hopes for this podcast!
I appreciate your comment. You are not the first one with these feelings on the episode. I will paste the reply I gave on Facebook so that it can somewhat explain my reasoning:
While I put a little humor in it, reading through letters from Orson Pratt to Brigham Young, I could sense his frustrations and loneliness on the matter and wanted to convey that also.
When it comes to the Historical side of it, everything I read is either quoted or accurate even including Wilford getting kicked by a horse on his baptismal day, Wilford not writing about the transfiguration, the stance on Hot Chocolate, that nobody would have called it a Theory etc.
My idea with the podcast when it comes to Historical items, is how they affect a person in this case Orson Pratt specifically. Because there were a lot of Journal Entries about him from others, I felt it might be easier to convey it in a mock interview rather than me just reading each source individually.
My podcast isn’t meant to be satire by nature as I find the beauty in the story of History and how it affected those involved. And by beauty I mean the raw history the al natural concept of it not necessarily that it is beautiful or peaceful.
I appreciate your feedback and hope that you will continue to listen and provide feedback so that I can improve.